<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Licensing for .Net Portal Frameworks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elegantcode.com/2007/09/10/open-source-licensing-for-net-portal-frameworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elegantcode.com/2007/09/10/open-source-licensing-for-net-portal-frameworks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=open-source-licensing-for-net-portal-frameworks</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Starr</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2007/09/10/open-source-licensing-for-net-portal-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-8515</link>
		<dc:creator>David Starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 04:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=647#comment-8515</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the clarification. Good one :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the clarification. Good one <img src='http://elegantcode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hartvig</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2007/09/10/open-source-licensing-for-net-portal-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-8476</link>
		<dc:creator>Hartvig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=647#comment-8476</guid>
		<description>BSD and MIT style licenses are best for your purpose - GPL and derived license styles are more or less incompatible. 

But always remember to check the whole license. In umbraco, the framework is licensed under MIT, but the content management UI is not open source but freeware. The license clearly states that you&#039;re NOT allowed to re-brand and distribute the UI modified without a commercial license and as such umbraco is excluded:
http://umbraco.org/license

Hope this helps and good luck!

Niels / umbraco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BSD and MIT style licenses are best for your purpose &#8211; GPL and derived license styles are more or less incompatible. </p>
<p>But always remember to check the whole license. In umbraco, the framework is licensed under MIT, but the content management UI is not open source but freeware. The license clearly states that you&#8217;re NOT allowed to re-brand and distribute the UI modified without a commercial license and as such umbraco is excluded:<br />
<a href="http://umbraco.org/license" rel="nofollow">http://umbraco.org/license</a></p>
<p>Hope this helps and good luck!</p>
<p>Niels / umbraco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Pierce</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2007/09/10/open-source-licensing-for-net-portal-frameworks/comment-page-1/#comment-8295</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Pierce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=647#comment-8295</guid>
		<description>1 for Cuyahoga http://www.cuyahoga-project.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 for Cuyahoga <a href="http://www.cuyahoga-project.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cuyahoga-project.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

