http://elegantcode.com/2008/03/24/the-c-30-compiler-vs-net-20-projects/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-c-30-compiler-vs-net-20-projects Tue, 08 May 2012 09:13:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://elegantcode.com/2008/03/24/the-c-30-compiler-vs-net-20-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-20118 visual basic 2005 compiler Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:05:08 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2008/03/24/the-c-30-compiler-vs-net-20-projects/#comment-20118 [...] [...] [...] [...]

]]> http://elegantcode.com/2008/03/24/the-c-30-compiler-vs-net-20-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-18663 trasa Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:30:46 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2008/03/24/the-c-30-compiler-vs-net-20-projects/#comment-18663 That's a good question - I will see if I can get more information out of person who reported the original problem. It would be interesting to see what they were trying to do... That’s a good question – I will see if I can get more information out of person who reported the original problem. It would be interesting to see what they were trying to do…

]]> http://elegantcode.com/2008/03/24/the-c-30-compiler-vs-net-20-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-18653 Betty Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:48:37 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2008/03/24/the-c-30-compiler-vs-net-20-projects/#comment-18653 Interesting post, although it would be nice to hear more about what went wrong with that first project you referenced. I'm not sure I see why c# 2.0 code would go wrong when compiled as 3.0, especially if you're not using the 3.5 framework. Interesting post, although it would be nice to hear more about what went wrong with that first project you referenced. I’m not sure I see why c# 2.0 code would go wrong when compiled as 3.0, especially if you’re not using the 3.5 framework.

]]>