<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=twitter</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Rector</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-20357</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Rector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 00:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/#comment-20357</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been very interesting for me to observe how different people use Twitter and what they expect from it.

Scobleizer definitely seems to use it as a fire hose. Following thousands of people, it seems impossible for it to be anything but. I eventually unfollowed him because of the massive amount of conversations he has that I have no interest in.

I prefer following close friends, coworkers, and various people who run in various circles, such as the agile sphere. Agilists frequently express viewpoints and carry out interesting debate that I find incredibly valuable. Because I am interested in specific parties, I tend to want to read every single tweet.

Then there are people who expect following others in Twitter to be more like subscribing to a blog. They follow very few people and I expect they want a low frequency of tweets to review, and they expect them to be interesting. A fellow coworker unfollowed me recently, for example, because I simply tweet too much for his liking. I thought Scobleizer was over the edge, but for some people, even I am over the edge.

It&#039;s important to note that I would still be following people like Scobleizer if I could more finely tune my notification settings. I prefer to &quot;show all @ replies&quot;, which means I see absolutely everything the people I follow tweet-- even bits of conversation with others. And that&#039;s what I want-- it allows me to discover other interesting people.

As soon as a Twitter client comes along that allows me to split the people I&#039;m following into different groups and review those &quot;tweetstreams&quot; independently, I&#039;ll be head-over heels in love with Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been very interesting for me to observe how different people use Twitter and what they expect from it.</p>
<p>Scobleizer definitely seems to use it as a fire hose. Following thousands of people, it seems impossible for it to be anything but. I eventually unfollowed him because of the massive amount of conversations he has that I have no interest in.</p>
<p>I prefer following close friends, coworkers, and various people who run in various circles, such as the agile sphere. Agilists frequently express viewpoints and carry out interesting debate that I find incredibly valuable. Because I am interested in specific parties, I tend to want to read every single tweet.</p>
<p>Then there are people who expect following others in Twitter to be more like subscribing to a blog. They follow very few people and I expect they want a low frequency of tweets to review, and they expect them to be interesting. A fellow coworker unfollowed me recently, for example, because I simply tweet too much for his liking. I thought Scobleizer was over the edge, but for some people, even I am over the edge.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to note that I would still be following people like Scobleizer if I could more finely tune my notification settings. I prefer to &#8220;show all @ replies&#8221;, which means I see absolutely everything the people I follow tweet&#8211; even bits of conversation with others. And that&#8217;s what I want&#8211; it allows me to discover other interesting people.</p>
<p>As soon as a Twitter client comes along that allows me to split the people I&#8217;m following into different groups and review those &#8220;tweetstreams&#8221; independently, I&#8217;ll be head-over heels in love with Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trasa</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-20348</link>
		<dc:creator>trasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/#comment-20348</guid>
		<description>I enjoy the informal nature of twitter.  I don&#039;t follow it too closely, but will scan through for interesting stuff in between builds, waiting for visual studio to start up, that sort of thing.   

Agree about having a good client: I&#039;ve been using Twhirl, and occasionally grab the trunk of Witty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy the informal nature of twitter.  I don&#8217;t follow it too closely, but will scan through for interesting stuff in between builds, waiting for visual studio to start up, that sort of thing.   </p>
<p>Agree about having a good client: I&#8217;ve been using Twhirl, and occasionally grab the trunk of Witty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Badera</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-20330</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Badera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/#comment-20330</guid>
		<description>bits. bits and pieces. not pits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bits. bits and pieces. not pits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Badera</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-20329</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Badera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/#comment-20329</guid>
		<description>Twitter is a modern party line - always on. I use it to pick pits and pieces of news and events out of the twitterstream, and research them through other means. It&#039;s not intimate, though you could use it that way, setting yourself as protected, following only a small number of people. I find Twitter more suitable as a firehose however. IM and email are more appropriate for more regular, personal contact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is a modern party line &#8211; always on. I use it to pick pits and pieces of news and events out of the twitterstream, and research them through other means. It&#8217;s not intimate, though you could use it that way, setting yourself as protected, following only a small number of people. I find Twitter more suitable as a firehose however. IM and email are more appropriate for more regular, personal contact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Berther</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-20321</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Berther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/#comment-20321</guid>
		<description>@alex: think of it is a very public instant messaging application. A place to capture the things you think about that arent worthy of their own blog post. You only have 140 characters, so it must be pithy. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alex: think of it is a very public instant messaging application. A place to capture the things you think about that arent worthy of their own blog post. You only have 140 characters, so it must be pithy. <img src='http://elegantcode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarod</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-20320</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/04/29/twitter/#comment-20320</guid>
		<description>I have been using it more and more. I kind of like it :) I think a good client is a necessary so its not so invasive.... less noise so you can selectively task switch.

jarodferguson if anyone wants to follow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using it more and more. I kind of like it <img src='http://elegantcode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I think a good client is a necessary so its not so invasive&#8230;. less noise so you can selectively task switch.</p>
<p>jarodferguson if anyone wants to follow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

