<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>BUY Genegra ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elegantcode.com/2008/05/06/report-on-stpcon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/05/06/report-on-stpcon/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=report-on-stpcon</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Genegra ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/05/06/report-on-stpcon/comment-page-1/#comment-20669</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Heusser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 13:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/05/06/report-on-stpcon/#comment-20669</guid>
		<description>Hey man, I&#039;m glad you enjoyed STPCon, and thank you for the mention.  I had a blast.

As for what is rapid testing - well, I&#039;m no Michael Bolton, but I have created a wiki page comparing some different strategies of software testing, and RST is one of them:

http://www.testingperspective.com/tpwiki/doku.php?id=fundamental_strategies

The idea is the 40,000-foot level.  I don&#039;t know if Bolton and Bach would agree with what I wrote as a philosophical approach - but I have seen a good bit of how they actually test software, so I do think the page reflects what they actually *do* ...

Of course, It&#039;s a wiki.  If you don&#039;t like it, you change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey man, I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed STPCon, and thank you for the mention.  I had a blast.</p>
<p>As for what is rapid testing &#8211; well, I&#8217;m no Michael Bolton, but I have created a wiki page comparing some different strategies of software testing, and RST is one of them:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.testingperspective.com/tpwiki/doku.php?id=fundamental_strategies" rel="nofollow">http://www.testingperspective.com/tpwiki/doku.php?id=fundamental_strategies</a></p>
<p>The idea is the 40,000-foot level.  I don&#8217;t know if Bolton and Bach would agree with what I wrote as a philosophical approach &#8211; but I have seen a good bit of how they actually test software, so I do think the page reflects what they actually *do* &#8230;</p>
<p>Of course, It&#8217;s a wiki.  If you don&#8217;t like it, you change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Genegra ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/05/06/report-on-stpcon/comment-page-1/#comment-20611</link>
		<dc:creator>David Starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 04:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/05/06/report-on-stpcon/#comment-20611</guid>
		<description>So, what is Rapid Testing and how is it done?

Throw us a bone :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what is Rapid Testing and how is it done?</p>
<p>Throw us a bone <img src='http://elegantcode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

