Comments on: Active Conventions with NDepend – Part Deux http://elegantcode.com/2008/07/02/active-conventions-with-ndepend-part-deux/ Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:54:42 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Jan Van Ryswyck http://elegantcode.com/2008/07/02/active-conventions-with-ndepend-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-25815 Jan Van Ryswyck Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:04:22 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2008/07/02/active-conventions-with-ndepend-part-deux/#comment-25815 Thanks. I will have a look at that. Thanks. I will have a look at that.

]]> By: Patrick Smacchia http://elegantcode.com/2008/07/02/active-conventions-with-ndepend-part-deux/comment-page-1/#comment-25572 Patrick Smacchia Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:52:44 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2008/07/02/active-conventions-with-ndepend-part-deux/#comment-25572 I am not sure it'd help in your sample, but I precise there is a CreateA and DepthOfCreateA CQL conditions. For example, the following CQL rule make sure that there is no instance of Nm1.Foo created outside of namespace Nm2: SELECT METHODS OUT OF NAMESPACES "Nm2" WHERE DepthOfCreateA "Nm1.Foo" == 1 I am not sure it’d help in your sample, but I precise there is a CreateA and DepthOfCreateA CQL conditions. For example, the following CQL rule make sure that there is no instance of Nm1.Foo created outside of namespace Nm2:

SELECT METHODS OUT OF NAMESPACES “Nm2″ WHERE
DepthOfCreateA “Nm1.Foo” == 1

]]>