<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>BUY Amikacin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elegantcode.com/2008/10/27/2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/10/27/2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Amikacin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/10/27/2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-36482</link>
		<dc:creator>trasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/10/27/2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010/#comment-36482</guid>
		<description>Explorer support - that would be nice.  I was thinking this morning about how we don&#039;t actually use Visual Studio for all of our development (I know,the horror, how could they!) - sometimes VS is just too slow.  Last I checked, with TFS:SCC if you didn&#039;t do it in Visual Studio, it didn&#039;t happen. 

(minus awesome hacks like SvnBridge, of course)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explorer support &#8211; that would be nice.  I was thinking this morning about how we don&#8217;t actually use Visual Studio for all of our development (I know,the horror, how could they!) &#8211; sometimes VS is just too slow.  Last I checked, with TFS:SCC if you didn&#8217;t do it in Visual Studio, it didn&#8217;t happen. </p>
<p>(minus awesome hacks like SvnBridge, of course)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Amikacin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/10/27/2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-36470</link>
		<dc:creator>David Starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/10/27/2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010/#comment-36470</guid>
		<description>Tony, You are spot on that offline is not a first class citizen. Unfortunately, the best TFS story for that at this time is detailed here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc667405.aspx

And it isn&#039;t great. TFS SCC is definately an online model. This can work okay when connecting through VPN (or using the machinations detailed in the link I posted).

I happen to know your specific story and I still have to recomend a fatter pipe as a first order priority, followed by proxy server. 

OK, all of that said: Yes, I want optimistic merge too. I have not heard any burbling that this feature is on the horizon.

What IS on the horizon (November SP for TFS) is baked in Windows Explorer support, detailed in this post:
http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/10/01/preview-of-the-next-tfs-power-tools-release.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony, You are spot on that offline is not a first class citizen. Unfortunately, the best TFS story for that at this time is detailed here:<br />
<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc667405.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc667405.aspx</a></p>
<p>And it isn&#8217;t great. TFS SCC is definately an online model. This can work okay when connecting through VPN (or using the machinations detailed in the link I posted).</p>
<p>I happen to know your specific story and I still have to recomend a fatter pipe as a first order priority, followed by proxy server. </p>
<p>OK, all of that said: Yes, I want optimistic merge too. I have not heard any burbling that this feature is on the horizon.</p>
<p>What IS on the horizon (November SP for TFS) is baked in Windows Explorer support, detailed in this post:<br />
<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/10/01/preview-of-the-next-tfs-power-tools-release.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/10/01/preview-of-the-next-tfs-power-tools-release.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>BUY Amikacin ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/10/27/2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-36468</link>
		<dc:creator>trasa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2008/10/27/2010-feature-preview-for-tfs-vsts-2010/#comment-36468</guid>
		<description>How about - SCC - Working disconnected as a first-class way of doing things supported yet?  Full 100% support for optimistic concurrency?  

These two things keep me from using TFS, and worse - they are things that actively get in my way with clients who have bought TFS since &#039;nobody gets fired for buying Microsoft&#039; (even when they have no need of all those enterprisey features)  If i wasn&#039;t for SvnBridge my pace of development would be millions of times slower.  (perhaps i exaggerate, a bit)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8211; SCC &#8211; Working disconnected as a first-class way of doing things supported yet?  Full 100% support for optimistic concurrency?  </p>
<p>These two things keep me from using TFS, and worse &#8211; they are things that actively get in my way with clients who have bought TFS since &#8216;nobody gets fired for buying Microsoft&#8217; (even when they have no need of all those enterprisey features)  If i wasn&#8217;t for SvnBridge my pace of development would be millions of times slower.  (perhaps i exaggerate, a bit)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

