<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Resolvable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-resolvable</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elegant Code &#187; The Injected Context</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/comment-page-1/#comment-41590</link>
		<dc:creator>Elegant Code &#187; The Injected Context</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 06:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1711#comment-41590</guid>
		<description>[...] Nicholas points out some of the issues with a traditional approach of a static global container (Fragility, Reduced Composability, Limited Reuse and Resumption of Control). These are issues which I have seen peers solve repeatedly as of late by delegating resolution though a provider/proxy interface like IResolver&lt;T&gt; or Resolvable&lt;T&gt;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nicholas points out some of the issues with a traditional approach of a static global container (Fragility, Reduced Composability, Limited Reuse and Resumption of Control). These are issues which I have seen peers solve repeatedly as of late by delegating resolution though a provider/proxy interface like IResolver&lt;T&gt; or Resolvable&lt;T&gt;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarod Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/comment-page-1/#comment-40711</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarod Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1711#comment-40711</guid>
		<description>http://blogs.msdn.com/gblock/archive/2008/12/22/mef-ruby-and-the-machinations-of-nicholas-blumhardt.aspx

http://ubik.com.au/article/named/some_great_news

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/gblock/archive/2008/12/22/mef-ruby-and-the-machinations-of-nicholas-blumhardt.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/gblock/archive/2008/12/22/mef-ruby-and-the-machinations-of-nicholas-blumhardt.aspx</a></p>
<p><a href="http://ubik.com.au/article/named/some_great_news" rel="nofollow">http://ubik.com.au/article/named/some_great_news</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://elegantcode.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Brion</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/comment-page-1/#comment-40701</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Brion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1711#comment-40701</guid>
		<description>dunno about any of the Autofac guys being on the MEF team, but Hammett (from Castle Windsor) is on the team though</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dunno about any of the Autofac guys being on the MEF team, but Hammett (from Castle Windsor) is on the team though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarod Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/comment-page-1/#comment-40699</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarod Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1711#comment-40699</guid>
		<description>Autofac is pretty cool, though changing Containers is usually not an option once development is full swing.

The nested container approach doesn&#039;t bother me actually, it has some good benefits. I think MEF is going to do the same. In fact, I think the AutoFac guy is on the MEF team?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autofac is pretty cool, though changing Containers is usually not an option once development is full swing.</p>
<p>The nested container approach doesn&#8217;t bother me actually, it has some good benefits. I think MEF is going to do the same. In fact, I think the AutoFac guy is on the MEF team?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Brion</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/comment-page-1/#comment-40693</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Brion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1711#comment-40693</guid>
		<description>Autofac uses nested containers to handle it... not really a fan of that approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autofac uses nested containers to handle it&#8230; not really a fan of that approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/comment-page-1/#comment-40687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1711#comment-40687</guid>
		<description>You may want to seriously consider looking at Autofac, an IoC container which handles disposals.  It does this by tracking much the same way you are above but without all the custom code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to seriously consider looking at Autofac, an IoC container which handles disposals.  It does this by tracking much the same way you are above but without all the custom code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Brion</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/comment-page-1/#comment-40624</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Brion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1711#comment-40624</guid>
		<description>Thanks... i just love &#039;abusing&#039; the using block to prevent mistakes.  i have another example here:
http://davybrion.com/blog/2008/05/easy-non-blocking-locking/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230; i just love &#8216;abusing&#8217; the using block to prevent mistakes.  i have another example here:<br />
<a href="http://davybrion.com/blog/2008/05/easy-non-blocking-locking/" rel="nofollow">http://davybrion.com/blog/2008/05/easy-non-blocking-locking/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarod Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/21/the-resolvable/comment-page-1/#comment-40623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarod Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1711#comment-40623</guid>
		<description>Pretty Cool Davy. I was hanging out with Glenn Block at Kaizen and he wrote something very similar which he called IResolver. He was solving a different problem in that you dont always have the luxury of, or want, a container reference, but the pattern is exactly the same. I really like how you have used it to solve the disposable problem you have been posting about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty Cool Davy. I was hanging out with Glenn Block at Kaizen and he wrote something very similar which he called IResolver. He was solving a different problem in that you dont always have the luxury of, or want, a container reference, but the pattern is exactly the same. I really like how you have used it to solve the disposable problem you have been posting about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

