<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tired Of Working With Big Visual Studio Solutions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merill</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-41601</link>
		<dc:creator>Merill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1733#comment-41601</guid>
		<description>Having the solution on a different hard disk will solve your problem. See ScottGu&#039;s post on it here.

http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/11/01/tip-trick-hard-drive-speed-and-visual-studio-performance.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having the solution on a different hard disk will solve your problem. See ScottGu&#8217;s post on it here.</p>
<p><a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/11/01/tip-trick-hard-drive-speed-and-visual-studio-performance.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/11/01/tip-trick-hard-drive-speed-and-visual-studio-performance.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Brion</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-41562</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Brion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1733#comment-41562</guid>
		<description>@Willie

you can, but it&#039;s not very practical if one of the referenced dll&#039;s is updated pretty much every hour or when you need to make changes in multiple assemblies to implement a new feature

@Friend

Resharper and Visual SVN definitely introduce some extra slowness, but Visual Studio itself is the main culprit... for large solutions, Visual Studio is unbearably slow regardless of whether you have resharper/visual svn installed or not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Willie</p>
<p>you can, but it&#8217;s not very practical if one of the referenced dll&#8217;s is updated pretty much every hour or when you need to make changes in multiple assemblies to implement a new feature</p>
<p>@Friend</p>
<p>Resharper and Visual SVN definitely introduce some extra slowness, but Visual Studio itself is the main culprit&#8230; for large solutions, Visual Studio is unbearably slow regardless of whether you have resharper/visual svn installed or not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friend</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-41561</link>
		<dc:creator>Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1733#comment-41561</guid>
		<description>most of the times, vs.net add-on&#039;s are the main problem, not the ide itself.
you are using resharper, your are using visual svn (based on the above images). these add-on&#039;s monitor your codes and activities, so they will have the main impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of the times, vs.net add-on&#8217;s are the main problem, not the ide itself.<br />
you are using resharper, your are using visual svn (based on the above images). these add-on&#8217;s monitor your codes and activities, so they will have the main impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willie Tilton</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-41558</link>
		<dc:creator>Willie Tilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 18:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1733#comment-41558</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t you have two totally seperate solutions, and then just reference in the dlls from the other solution?  This way you could have a lib or dependencies folder, which when you build from the first solution would copy the dlls into the folder, and then when you update your code the latest dlls would be included automatically.  That way you wouldn&#039;t have everyone on the team needing a rebuild and you&#039;d still accomplish the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t you have two totally seperate solutions, and then just reference in the dlls from the other solution?  This way you could have a lib or dependencies folder, which when you build from the first solution would copy the dlls into the folder, and then when you update your code the latest dlls would be included automatically.  That way you wouldn&#8217;t have everyone on the team needing a rebuild and you&#8217;d still accomplish the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Penney</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-41507</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Penney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 09:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1733#comment-41507</guid>
		<description>Another problem I can see with this is if you are doing any refactoring, Resharper won&#039;t pick up the references in the larger project. A good idea for a stable codebase however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another problem I can see with this is if you are doing any refactoring, Resharper won&#8217;t pick up the references in the larger project. A good idea for a stable codebase however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Brion</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-41486</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Brion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1733#comment-41486</guid>
		<description>yea Resharper doesn&#039;t recognize the stuff you use from projects that you didn&#039;t include in your solution.  In our case it&#039;s usually not a problem since that only happens on pages that only use the old stuff.... we don&#039;t have pages that mix the new and the old stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea Resharper doesn&#8217;t recognize the stuff you use from projects that you didn&#8217;t include in your solution.  In our case it&#8217;s usually not a problem since that only happens on pages that only use the old stuff&#8230;. we don&#8217;t have pages that mix the new and the old stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergio Pereira</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2008/12/28/tired-of-working-with-big-visual-studio-solutions/comment-page-1/#comment-41483</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/?p=1733#comment-41483</guid>
		<description>For a moment I believed this would be very helpful for me... Until I tried and Resharper went berserk on the missing references, even though VS compiles the small solution just fine. Apparently I&#039;m destined to eternal frustration with this large solution I have to work with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a moment I believed this would be very helpful for me&#8230; Until I tried and Resharper went berserk on the missing references, even though VS compiles the small solution just fine. Apparently I&#8217;m destined to eternal frustration with this large solution I have to work with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

