Comments on: IoC libraries compared http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ioc-libraries-compared Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:42:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Dror Messi http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-4/#comment-64202 Dror Messi Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:45:00 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-64202 jghk jghk

]]> By: San_kan1gb http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-4/#comment-64034 San_kan1gb Tue, 05 Jul 2011 05:44:00 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-64034 very good post, thanx. but can u: 1. add MEF to the others in detail. 2. update the post for this year 2011. very good post, thanx.
but can u:
1. add MEF to the others in detail.
2. update the post for this year 2011.

]]> By: Benjy http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-4/#comment-43895 Benjy Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:36:48 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-43895 Excellent article. Maybe worth reading Ayende's excellent post on MEF explaining why MEF is not an IoC container. http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/09/25/the-managed-extensibility-framework.aspx Excellent article. Maybe worth reading Ayende’s excellent post on MEF explaining why MEF is not an IoC container.

http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2008/09/25/the-managed-extensibility-framework.aspx

]]> By: Confluence: Java http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-4/#comment-43890 Confluence: Java Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:29:36 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-43890 <strong>Spring Dependency Injection...</strong> Resources Google talks: Clean code talks on dependency injection... Spring Dependency Injection…

Resources Google talks: Clean code talks on dependency injection…

]]> By: IoC - StructureMap Links « QuantuMatrix’s Weblog http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-4/#comment-43363 IoC - StructureMap Links « QuantuMatrix’s Weblog Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:24:12 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-43363 [...] IoC libraries compared [...] [...] IoC libraries compared [...]

]]> By: Chris Brandsma http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-3/#comment-42976 Chris Brandsma Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:54:04 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-42976 @Wade: I didn't say you had to have attributes with StructureMap, I said attributes were an option. Just like Xml config...it is an option. @Wade: I didn’t say you had to have attributes with StructureMap, I said attributes were an option. Just like Xml config…it is an option.

]]> By: Wade http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-3/#comment-42972 Wade Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:42:53 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-42972 Just a note, I have StructureMap working completely free of config files and without attributes! It wasn't mentioned in your coverage but you can register all of the objects by simply calling IAssemblyScanner.LookForRegistries() within the object factory initialization. Then in your registry file you setup fluently your contracts and defaults. No attributes needed! Just a note, I have StructureMap working completely free of config files and without attributes! It wasn’t mentioned in your coverage but you can register all of the objects by simply calling IAssemblyScanner.LookForRegistries() within the object factory initialization. Then in your registry file you setup fluently your contracts and defaults. No attributes needed!

]]> By: Bryan http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-3/#comment-42836 Bryan Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:03:39 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-42836 I love Autofac. It's syntax is great, it's so simple to configure, and it doesn't include everything and the kitchen sink (which I don't need). Spring's XML configuration? I hope I never have to touch that ever again... I love Autofac. It’s syntax is great, it’s so simple to configure, and it doesn’t include everything and the kitchen sink (which I don’t need).

Spring’s XML configuration? I hope I never have to touch that ever again…

]]> By: wolf++ » TuneWiz Loosely Coupled, Easily Testable http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-3/#comment-42803 wolf++ » TuneWiz Loosely Coupled, Easily Testable Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:30:11 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-42803 [...] feels awkward to me. I know there are tools to help with this, but I’m not ready to pick an IoC library. I don’t feel like things are complex enough to warrant it. I was just read this article, [...] [...] feels awkward to me. I know there are tools to help with this, but I’m not ready to pick an IoC library. I don’t feel like things are complex enough to warrant it. I was just read this article, [...]

]]> By: Weekly Links #35 | GrantPalin.com http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/comment-page-3/#comment-42594 Weekly Links #35 | GrantPalin.com Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:37:23 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/01/07/ioc-libraries-compared/#comment-42594 [...] IoC libraries compared Nice faceoff between different Inversion of Control libraries. Very helpful. [...] [...] IoC libraries compared Nice faceoff between different Inversion of Control libraries. Very helpful. [...]

]]>