<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unit Testing/Mocking on .net cf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elegantcode.com/2009/04/29/unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elegantcode.com/2009/04/29/unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peli</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2009/04/29/unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf/comment-page-1/#comment-45819</link>
		<dc:creator>Peli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2009/04/29/unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf/#comment-45819</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m the dev responsible of the Stubs framework. It is true that our code generator has not been designed to load .net cf or silverlight applications yet but conceptually the generated stubs should work on any platforms (as you noticed). I&#039;ll add this on the todo list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m the dev responsible of the Stubs framework. It is true that our code generator has not been designed to load .net cf or silverlight applications yet but conceptually the generated stubs should work on any platforms (as you noticed). I&#8217;ll add this on the todo list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dew Drop - April 30, 2009 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2009/04/29/unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf/comment-page-1/#comment-45815</link>
		<dc:creator>Dew Drop - April 30, 2009 &#124; Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2009/04/29/unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf/#comment-45815</guid>
		<description>[...] Unit Testing/Mocking on .net cf (Chris Brandsma) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unit Testing/Mocking on .net cf (Chris Brandsma) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garry Shutler</title>
		<link>http://elegantcode.com/2009/04/29/unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf/comment-page-1/#comment-45812</link>
		<dc:creator>Garry Shutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 09:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elegantcode.com/2009/04/29/unit-testingmocking-on-net-cf/#comment-45812</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done quite a lot of TDD with .NET CF. Some of the benefits it has brought me are groking the use of shared contexts and a deep love for the likes of RhinoMocks.

However, even though it&#039;s painful compared to other TDD I&#039;d still take it over coding without tests. Especially as our code requires deployment and logging into the so the manual debug process takes 5 minutes minimum. I&#039;ve got 700 odd tests running in a minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done quite a lot of TDD with .NET CF. Some of the benefits it has brought me are groking the use of shared contexts and a deep love for the likes of RhinoMocks.</p>
<p>However, even though it&#8217;s painful compared to other TDD I&#8217;d still take it over coding without tests. Especially as our code requires deployment and logging into the so the manual debug process takes 5 minutes minimum. I&#8217;ve got 700 odd tests running in a minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

