Comments on: Write a Sortable ObservableCollection for WPF http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/ Mon, 06 Sep 2010 17:48:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Ryan Williams http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/comment-page-1/#comment-46420 Ryan Williams Mon, 25 May 2009 15:24:28 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/#comment-46420 Thanks i saw this on http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/5909dbcc-9a9f-4260-bc36-de4aa9bbd383 first but that didnt have ascending and descending. Thanks i saw this on http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/wpf/thread/5909dbcc-9a9f-4260-bc36-de4aa9bbd383 first but that didnt have ascending and descending.

]]> By: Brian Lagunas http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/comment-page-1/#comment-46248 Brian Lagunas Mon, 18 May 2009 23:38:19 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/#comment-46248 <a href="#comment-46243" rel="nofollow">@Itay Sagui </a> Well, this isn't a cure all, solve all solution. This is just one way to accomplish a common task. It is a simple implementation, so just about anyone can understand how it works. I use it on a simple read only list of objects that have only 2 properties, so I notice no problems with performance even with records of over 5,000. If you have a more efficient method please share your solution. @Itay Sagui

Well, this isn’t a cure all, solve all solution. This is just one way to accomplish a common task. It is a simple implementation, so just about anyone can understand how it works. I use it on a simple read only list of objects that have only 2 properties, so I notice no problems with performance even with records of over 5,000. If you have a more efficient method please share your solution.

]]> By: Itay Sagui http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/comment-page-1/#comment-46243 Itay Sagui Mon, 18 May 2009 21:10:48 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/#comment-46243 Isn't it TERRIBLE unefficient to iterate over the sorted list, find the old & new index of each item, and them move it? Isn’t it TERRIBLE unefficient to iterate over the sorted list, find the old & new index of each item, and them move it?

]]> By: Dew Drop - May 15, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/comment-page-1/#comment-46176 Dew Drop - May 15, 2009 | Alvin Ashcraft's Morning Dew Fri, 15 May 2009 12:27:36 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/#comment-46176 [...] Write a Sortable ObservableCollection for WPF (Brian Lagunas) [...] [...] Write a Sortable ObservableCollection for WPF (Brian Lagunas) [...]

]]> By: SortedObservableCollection « This one goes to 11 http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/comment-page-1/#comment-46157 SortedObservableCollection « This one goes to 11 Fri, 15 May 2009 00:34:21 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2009/05/14/write-a-sortable-observablecollection-for-wpf/#comment-46157 [...] read a post earlier today presenting an implementation of a SortedObservableCollection and I thought to myself, [...] [...] read a post earlier today presenting an implementation of a SortedObservableCollection and I thought to myself, [...]

]]>