BUY Menosan ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION

August 25th, 2009

BUY Menosan ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION, OK, on a previous post I had a little bit of code with a ‘var’ statement in it.  Actually, there were a few other items in there, couple of lambdas, lots of nested ‘if’s, etc.   There was a lot of good hand wrangling on how performant the Lambda ‘Where’ function is.  According to the comments, not very performant for very large datasets.  I don’t have a problem with that.

But at some point one of the commentors noticed that the var statement was just as fast as the explicitly called out type.  Let me spell something out real quick: Once compiled, there is no difference between var and explicit types.  ‘var’ is a language sort-cut, asking the compiler to figure out the type and inject it.  This is not a runtime feature – ‘var’ is a compile time feature.

Now, how often do I use var in my code?  All the time.  I use it practically everywhere.  Think of it as a refactoring helper.  Sometime I have to change a method from returning a IList to an IEnumerable.  If I use a var and a foreach then none of the rest of my code has to change.  That, to me is flexible code.

I could make my code more performant by replacing the foreach loops with for loops – but I’ll keep the var’s thank-you-very-much.  But most of the time I am not dealing with enough data to make that worth it.  Most of the time I’m working with data to get displayed on web and mobile user interfaces.  In those cases, limiting the amount of data I need to process, and then display, is of upmost importance.  If I’m doing a file import (rare, but it does happen), then I switch to the other techniques.

Now, why bother?  Why not always use the fastest method all the time?  Because I find the foreach with ‘var’s easier to read, more flexable code, and more refactoring friendly.  For the vast majority of my code, that matters a lot more than eking out every last bit of performance.

. Real brand Menosan online. Buy Menosan from canada. Buy cheap Menosan. Online buy Menosan without a prescription. Menosan over the counter. Ordering Menosan online. Australia, uk, us, usa. Purchase Menosan ONLINE WITHOUT prescription. Buy Menosan no prescription. Buy no prescription Menosan online. Canada, mexico, india. Where to buy Menosan. Purchase Menosan. Order Menosan from United States pharmacy. Buy generic Menosan. Japan, craiglist, ebay, overseas, paypal. Buy Menosan ONLINE WITHOUT prescription. Where to buy Menosan. Buy cheap Menosan no rx. Where can i buy cheapest Menosan online. Online buying Menosan hcl. Menosan from canadian pharmacy. Order Menosan online overnight delivery no prescription. Menosan for sale. Rx free Menosan. Buying Menosan online over the counter. Buy Menosan without a prescription. Order Menosan online c.o.d. Order Menosan no prescription. Menosan trusted pharmacy reviews. Fast shipping Menosan. Kjøpe Menosan på nett, köpa Menosan online. Buy Menosan online cod. Buy Menosan without prescription. Order Menosan from mexican pharmacy. Purchase Menosan online. Comprar en línea Menosan, comprar Menosan baratos. Buy Menosan from mexico. Menosan samples. Where can i find Menosan online. Order Menosan from mexican pharmacy. Buy Menosan without a prescription. Where can i buy cheapest Menosan online. Buy Menosan from canada. Real brand Menosan online.

Similar posts: BUY Foot Care Cream ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION. BUY Seroquel ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION. Buy Glucotrol XL online cod. Penis Growth Pack (Pills + Oil) trusted pharmacy reviews.
Trackbacks from: BUY Menosan ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION. BUY Menosan ONLINE WITHOUT PRESCRIPTION. Buy Menosan from canada. Japan, craiglist, ebay, overseas, paypal. Menosan gel, ointment, cream, pill, spray, continuous-release, extended-release.

Newer Comments →
  • http://www.mattberther.com Matt Berther

    @chris: I hear this argument about for vs foreach all the time. Interestingly enough: the foreach appears to be just like var in your example. It’s a language shortcut. If you write the foreach and examine the compiled code with reflector, you’ll see that it turns into a for loop.

    That said, even if it wasnt, I’d prefer the readability over performant code… choosing to optimize the code only when a profile has told me that it is necessary. When optimizing prematurely, you’re virtually guaranteed to be optimizing the wrong thing.

  • http://elegantcode.com Chris Brandsma

    @matt, there are some differences between for and foreach. To use foreach the data must implement IEnumerable, and you are iterating thru the data via the IEnumerable interface behind the scenes. While for loop uses the indexer property. There is a small amount of overhead when using the Enumerator. Actually, if you dissasemble the for loop into some languages, it actual comes out as a while loop instead of a for (delphi).

  • http://chrismissal.lostechies.com Chris Missal

    Wow… I attended a book club we hold in Cedar Rapids tonight and we had this exact same conversation (almost verbatim). I pointed out that it helps when you refactor, but until our conversation I didn’t realize the “zero-difference” in performance. It’s actually quite obvious once you figure it out or somebody explains it like you did.

    1 for ALWAYS using var :)

  • Stubbs

    “Because I find the foreach with ‘var’s easier to read, more flexable code, and more refactoring friendly. For the vast majority of my code, that matters a lot more than eking out every last bit of performance.”

    Sounds like you’re talking yourself into using ironpython!

  • http://cromwellhaus.com/blogs/ryanc Ryan Cromwell

    Not that they are the source of all matters in code structure, but there is a reason R# suggests changing explicit types to var. It’s just nicer.

  • pebbles

    Consider this:

    var orderItems = GetOrderItems();

    How do you easily what type is returned by this method? The ‘var’ keyword in this examples destroys readability.

  • Jason

    @pebbles

    If GetOrderItems doesn’t return a collection of OrderItem, than there is something significantly wrong with that function name.

    But if you absolutely need to know what type orderItems is, any decent IDE will tell you this very simply.

    In short, if you are relying on a type declaration to tell you what type a function is returning, you should reconsider the name of your function.

  • Jeremy Gray

    @Chris – foreach behaviour is actually not tied to those interfaces, it is instead duck-typed by the compiler. The interfaces exist solely to help ensure that people implement the necessary members and to provide a usage hint as to the available functionality. Surprising, but true.

    @pebbles – I’m more of a (inferred) static typing guy myself, but it needs to be said that developers using languages that support inferred static typing or even full-on late-bound dynamic typing have been doing just fine for years and years, so the question you should be asking yourself is why are _you_ having that readability issue? Did you name the variable poorly? The method? Is the code around that line a mess that clouds the intent of code? And so on. If you _really_ need the type in place of var, I dare say the code has problems larger than its use of var. :)

  • http://elegantcode.com Chris Brandsma

    @Jeremy Gray: cool, I’ll look into the foreach a bit more. I love research after all. Here is a good starter: http://www.csharphelp.com/archives4/archive690.html

    @pebbles: the key components are the compiler and your tests. Knowing explicitly that the variable is a particular type does not always help readability. In fact, it often hurts readability — especially when you start dealing with generic types, you get 30 characters of type declaration BEFORE you see any code. And in the end, it tells you very little.

    @Stubbs: substitute Pythod for JavaScriptand yes.

  • David Williams

    The only issue that I have with “var” is that unless you are very careful occasionally it will infer the wrong type. I have had this happen when expecting the value to to be the higher level interface (a interface that derived from IList), but it choose the lowest level (IEnumerable) instead.

Newer Comments →