I see it as another SDLC with a great deal of good practices. Some make sense in a organization, some do not. For example, TDD is the hardest to sell for me as a consultant. Most developers today are trained in the more standard waterfall methodologies. I can usually sell automated tests, build machines, etc… But TDD is very difficult.

I am NOT talking about one person here, is the thing. I don’t understand why so many people I meet who are otherwise passionate and professional mock agile. Honestly, I don’t get it.

I shouldn’t have thrown in that bit about the water cooler because these people are often passionate about what they do. There are amazingly talented architects and developers who think agile is worthy of mockery.

Often, I am betting it is because of lack of understanding a feeling of being threatened. For those who actually understand the effects of agile teams and practices, but still mock it, I just don’t understand.

If your arguments for agile are so week that one schmuck can undermine them with a joke, then maybe you should rethink what your argument.

Dave you of all people should be able to provide good examples of why agile benefits the development process, if the CTO’s suspicions are “confirmed” by the joke you failed in 2 ways

1: Educating your CTO about what “agile” is
2: Making a solid case for how agile benefit your development process

Perhaps I should have been more declarative. I do not think this kind of “sardonic wit” is joking, it is a defense mechanism.

Mockery is the behavior of a coward or bully, often found in the same body.

Bob isn’t actually making a joke. He is being derisive and sarcastic, which is the most common retreat of the uninformed and threatened.

Hell, just watch Sarah (Bob) Palin make fun of that which she doesn’t understand. Ouch! Was that out loud?

Disclaimer: I feel better about making a political statement in the comments, not the main post

Frankly I think Agile could use a dose of “not so serious”. An unfortunately large percentage of its practitioners have a smug, elitist air about them from thinking what they do is soooooo important. (not directing that towards you, David They take things way too seriously as a result, belittling others that they claim they’re here to help learn. That’s much more of a potential pitfall than Bob is, in my book.

I believe in software as a craft, Agile, TDD, etc. But I also believe the best way to win people over is with results. Let Bob say what he will, and then simply prove him wrong. Bringing attention to Bob by noticing him gives his wisecracks more credence than they should. People don’t change because you tell them to, but they will change when they see the results. (if they’re not idiots. can’t do much about stupidity until genetic engineering comes around.)

Lighten up, roll with it, and evangelize Agile in today’s world knowing that people have feelings, including a sense of humor.

[insert starving kids in China reference here]