Comments on: Behaviors with MSpec http://elegantcode.com/2010/02/26/behaviors-with-mspec/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=behaviors-with-mspec Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:42:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: Ronald Verhaegen http://elegantcode.com/2010/02/26/behaviors-with-mspec/comment-page-1/#comment-54130 Ronald Verhaegen Mon, 01 Mar 2010 12:16:47 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2010/02/26/behaviors-with-mspec/#comment-54130 Same here, I don't see how this makes my life as a developer easier. I would rather just use a base class to put the general code in and use it for a new spec. Which I think is more transparent and less hasle. Same here, I don’t see how this makes my life as a developer easier. I would rather just use a base class to put the general code in and use it for a new spec. Which I think is more transparent and less hasle.

]]> By: Chris Martin http://elegantcode.com/2010/02/26/behaviors-with-mspec/comment-page-1/#comment-54086 Chris Martin Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:23:10 +0000 http://elegantcode.com/2010/02/26/behaviors-with-mspec/#comment-54086 It's neat and all, but I'm not sure what this brings to the table but more complexity...and code. My code base is complex enough. I don't need to train the team to learn a cryptic way of testing. Cool but I'll pass. Thanks. ;) It’s neat and all, but I’m not sure what this brings to the table but more complexity…and code.

My code base is complex enough. I don’t need to train the team to learn a cryptic way of testing.

Cool but I’ll pass. Thanks. ;)

]]>