2 Oct
2009

Windows Server 2008 R2 is Windows 7 “Server”

Category:UncategorizedTag: , , , , , :

Sometimes people get tripped up by this – at the least, its a little confusing.  A brief history lesson:

First there was Windows Server 2003.  And then in 2005, Microsoft released something of a super-service-pack with new functionality, patches, and other stuff.  It was much more than a regular service pack, full of optional components that shipped on a 2nd CD.  So, it was name “Windows Server 2003 R2.”  But underneath, it’s still Windows Server 2003 at the core.

You might think that Windows Server 2008 R2 follows the same naming convention.  But you’d be wrong.

Windows Server 2008 R2 is not “Windows Server 2008 + More Good Stuff,” it’s actually much more like “Windows 7 – Server Edition.”  The core is a different (though of course related) operating system. 

Why did Microsoft do this?  I’m sure they have good reasons… investment in the Windows 2008 ‘brand,’ major/minor naming schedules, and so on. 

I’m sure that Windows 2008 R2 is a wonderful operating system.  Windows 7 seems pretty nice, after all.  But, don’t be fooled by the name and think that upgrading from Windows 2008 to Windows 2008 R2 is no big deal, its a full blown OS upgrade. 

2 thoughts on “Windows Server 2008 R2 is Windows 7 “Server”

  1. One downer to going to R2 as a workstation OS is loss of full bluetooth. It has basic BT capabilities for mice/keyboard but you wont be able to use your BT headset, etc. The previous version could be hacked to get the full BT stack installed but as of yet it doesn’t seem that there is a way to do this for R2. Other than that its been a great upgrade! Boot time is definitely much faster, UI is prettier and some of the odd things that were happening in the the previous version are no longer happening.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.