5 thoughts on “Getting on the Bad Side of a Geek”
Comments are closed.
Disclaimer
The opinions and content expressed here are my own and not those of my employer.
Recent Posts
- Some articles I’ve written about the Azure Marketplace
- Rebooting the Azure for Executives Podcast with Landing Zones
- Refactoring Bloated Controllers with [FromService]
- Refactoring Bloated Controllers with IServiceProvider
- Life’s a Party: Analyzing Party Compositions for Combat – Encounters in Dungeons & Dragons Fifth Edition through Monte Carlo Methods
Find
Recent Articles
- Some articles I’ve written about the Azure Marketplace
- Rebooting the Azure for Executives Podcast with Landing Zones
- Refactoring Bloated Controllers with [FromService]
- Refactoring Bloated Controllers with IServiceProvider
- Life’s a Party: Analyzing Party Compositions for Combat – Encounters in Dungeons & Dragons Fifth Edition through Monte Carlo Methods
Recent Comments
- b.juraga on Refactoring Bloated Controllers with [FromService]
- The Morning Brew - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #3600 on Refactoring Bloated Controllers with [FromService]
- Andreas on Refactoring Bloated Controllers with [FromService]
- Refactoring Bloated Controllers with [FromService] - ElegantCode on Refactoring Bloated Controllers with IServiceProvider
- David Starr on Refactoring Bloated Controllers with IServiceProvider
I think that is e^(i*pie)
The last part is an infinite geometric series that converges to 1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_progression)
\frac12 \frac14 \frac18 \frac{1}{16} \cdots=\frac{1/2}{1-( 1/2)} = 1.
That gives:
e^{i*pi} 1 = 0 which is Euler’s identity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_identity)
Looks like those Bitches be getting .002 0 = $0.002
I think thats i*pi
The last part is an infinite geometric series that converges to 1 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_progression)
\frac12 \frac14 \frac18 \frac{1}{16} \cdots=\frac{1/2}{1-( 1/2)} = 1.
That gives:
e ^ (i * pi) 1 = 0 which is Euler’s identity (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_identity)
Looks like those Bitches be getting .002 0 = $0.002
The memo is pretty good. :-).
Ok… so this is old, but also, the text below the image is erroneous.
e^i(pi) is what the check should read, which is equal to -1.
So the check is made out for 2 tenths of a cent. which is a response to the verizon math fiasco – the one where the CSR could not understand there is a difference between 2/10ths of a cent and 2 cents.
http://www.verizonmath.com/
Did this check ever pay out?